The Draft Lower Snake River Dams Stakeholder Engagement Report was available for public review and comment review from Dec. 20, 2019 through 5pm on Jan. 24, 2020.
There were three public workshops on the draft report: (1) January 7 in Clarkston, (2) January 9 in Vancouver, Wash., and (3) January 13 in the Tri-Cities. Scroll down for more information.
The draft report summarizes the potential positive and negative impacts (social, economic, environmental) and opportunities gained and lost from the potential breaching and removal of the lower Snake River dams, as well as from retaining the dams. The consultant team was not tasked to make recommendations, but did ask people they interviewed what is needed to move this process out of a cycle of study, legal action and court decisions to one of greater benefit to the communities affected across Washington, and the salmon and orca.
Some themes emerged, among them:
- There are significantly different views of the impacts from breaching the dams on salmon, orca, agriculture, transportation and economics. More information is needed to create opportunities for greater understanding.
- Energy, transportation, agriculture, salmon and orca are complex issues and decisions about the lower Snake River dams need to consider the broader systems and context for each. Each issue is dynamic, future changes may provide more options as well as more challenges.
- People across the diversity of interests expressed the desire to have more informed and respectful conversations. Given that issues around the lower Snake River dams have long been in litigation, the ability for shared learning, collaborative problem-solving and a new dialogue has so far been limited. Many of those interviewed are hopeful about the significant benefits a collaborative dialogue could offer to a process that has so far been stuck in a cycle of study, legal actions and court decisions.
There were be three public workshops on January 7, 9, and 13 after the draft Lower Snake River Dams report is released in mid-December.
Purpose: to inform the interested public on the content of the draft report and provide an understanding of the different perspectives. The workshops are an opportunity to learn about the report in preparation of providing written comments by 5:00 pm on Friday, January 24, 2020.
Format: Presentation of the draft report findings followed by a panel discussion representing different interests. Oral public testimony will not be accepted during the workshops, but audience members can submit written questions that can be asked of the consultants and panel, provided time is available. Written comments on the draft report will be accepted through 5:00 PM on January 24, 2020 through the project website: http://lsrdstakeholderprocess.org/.
Time: Doors open at 6:00 pm, program starts at 6:30 pm, and ends at 8:30 pm, followed by 30 minutes or more of informal conversations.
The public workshops are being recorded and you can view recordings using the links below. The Pasco workshop was professionally recorded and is the best one to view if you are only interested in viewing one. For additional information about the panelists and workshop please view the workshop program.
- January 7th from 6:00pm – 9:00 pm: Clarkston
Quality Inn & Suites Conference Center
700 Port Drive, Clarkston, WA 99403
Video Recording: Panel discussion begins after presentation around 25:00 and video quality improves with the lights on at that point. Click here to view the workshop recording.
- January 9th from 6:00pm – 9:00 pm: Vancouver
Washington State University Vancouver – Dengerink Administration Building (VDEN)
14204 NE Salmon Creek Ave, Vancouver, WA 98686-9600
Video Recording: Panel discussion begins after presentation around 27:00. Please note that the audio transcript is automatically recorded by the web conferencing platform and due to technology constraints is not a high quality transcription. Click here to view the workshop recording.
- January 13th from 6:00pm – 9:00 pm: Tri Cities
Red Lion Hotel & Conference Center
2525 North 20th Avenue, Pasco, WA 99301
Video Recording: Thanks to City of Pasco for filming. Click here to view the workshop recording
Online Engagement Process
Responses to the online questionnaire were accepted through 5:00 pm on January 24, 2020, the end of the public comment period for the draft report.
In the fall of 2018, the Governor’s Southern Resident Killer Whale Task Force identified the need to further investigate the impacts of removing or breaching the lower Snake River dams (LSRD) as a way to provide more salmon for Southern Resident orcas to eat. The task force received hundreds of public comments about removing or breaching the dams. The task force did not have adequate time to fully consider all the issues raised by commenters so they recommended a separate engagement process. In response to this recommendation, the Washington State Legislature provided funding to the governor’s office in the 2019-21 operating budget:
…to contract with a neutral third party to establish a process for local, state, tribal and federal leaders and stakeholders to address issues associated with the possible breaching or removal of the lower Snake River dams in order to recover the Chinook salmon populations that serve as a vital food source for Southern Resident orcas
At the same time, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the federal Bureau of Reclamation, and Bonneville Power Administration – as co-lead agencies – are preparing an environmental impact statement (EIS). The EIS was ordered by the U.S. District Court for Oregon and is being conducted in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act. The EIS will evaluate the operations, maintenance and configurations of the four lower Snake River dams as part of the review of 14 federal projects in the Columbia River System. The draft EIS is scheduled to be publicly available in February 2020 and a final EIS completed in June 2020. Washington state is not a co-lead of this process.
To conduct the engagement process approved by the Legislature, the Washington State Governor’s Office hired a contractor team of Ross Strategic, Kramer Consulting, White Bluffs Consulting and Anchor QEA. The team is providing neutral facilitation and evaluation services. They are convening and meeting with local, state, tribal, and federal leaders, stakeholders and collect public comment. They are submitting a report detailing the potential positive and negative impacts (social, economic, environmental) and opportunities gained and lost from the potential breaching or removal of the LSRD, as well as from retaining the dams.
Gov. Inslee supports this process to hear from diverse voices and collect the range of views in Washington State in regard to the LSRD. He plans to use this information to help craft his recommendations to the federal court-ordered EIS.
What the Process Will Accomplish
The engagement process and report will:
- Provide a Washington State-focused summary of the effects of both retaining and breaching or removing the LSRD.
- Allow stakeholders, tribes and citizens an opportunity to express their opinions in a structured, neutral, facilitated process.
- Help inform the state of Washington position on the federal court-ordered EIS on Columbia River System operations.
What the Process Will Not Do
The engagement process and report will not:
- Not recommend whether the LSRD should be removed or breached.
- Not develop new or prioritize potential mitigation options, although it will reflect a range of stakeholder thoughts and existing information on this subject.
- Not provide recommendations on the best way to address costs and benefits from removing or breaching or retaining the LSRD.
- Not utilize a stakeholder board to review and approve the draft or final report.
- Not provide a summary of the effects on retaining or breaching/removal of the LSRD in Oregon, Idaho or Montana.
Process Details and Timeline
The work of the consultant team consists of the following components:
- Gather and summarize previous analysis related to LSRD retention, and removal or breaching: The consultant is reviewing and summarizing publicly available information sources related to LSRD retention, and removal or breaching. Those sources include documents and reports issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Bonneville Power Administration, conservation organizations, scientific publications, business organizations, tribal governments, fisheries, sport and commercial fishing organizations, and other groups.
- Engage with stakeholders, tribes, states, federal agencies, legislators and congressional delegation: The consultants are interviewing individual stakeholders and stakeholder groups, experts and governmental officials to identify the effects, concerns and issues with retaining, breaching or removal of LSRD. Given the extensive interest and impacts surrounding the dams, the consultant are not able to interview all people with interest in the issues. The goal is that all interested parties have confidence their perspective is considered and represented, whether they were interviewed or not. The governor’s office is leading engagement of impacted tribes including the Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC), and Upper Columbia United Tribes (UCUT) as well as engagement with the states of Oregon, Idaho and Montana. The governor’s office is briefing legislators, the state congressional delegation and federal agencies.
- Produce report: The consultant will complete a draft and final report summarizing publicly available information and the results of the stakeholder interviews, tribal and state consultation, and public comment.
- Gather public input: Following completion of the draft report, the consultant is hosting three public workshops on January 7, 9, and 13. Details are below.
|December 20, 2019|
|January 24, 2020|
|Early March 2020|